Skip to content
Research methodology

FlyClaimer Methodology

Understand the sources behind our passenger-rights guides, the checks a useful comparison needs, and the limits of general information about your flight.

Policy updated September 7, 2026
Transparency details

How this page helps passengers

Use these standards to understand how FlyClaimer explains passenger-rights guidance, how limits are disclosed, and where to go next.

01

How we research guides

Our starting questions are the operating airline, exact departure and arrival airports, travel date, booking arrangement and disruption. EU, UK, US and locally implemented Balkan rules are not interchangeable. A destination or airline brand alone does not establish coverage.

02

Match the source to the question

Use legislation and judgments for legal rules, regulator guidance for practical explanations, and an airline or airport for its current process or operating notice. A press release about a proposed reform is not proof that a new rule already applies. We distinguish publication, adoption and application dates.

03

Sources we prioritize

Recent source-led updates link to the relevant primary material so you can check it. Secondary reporting can identify an issue, but should not be the only support for an important deadline, entitlement or operational claim. Older pages may need further corrections; this policy is not a certification of the whole site.

04

What a credible ranking needs

A numerical comparison needs an identifiable dataset, reporting period, geographic coverage, metric, sample size and reproducible calculation. Arrival delay, departure delay, cancellations and air-traffic-flow delay measure different things. An illustrative airport list is not a ranking or a forecast for your flight.

05

Dates and review limits

A source-check date records the material checked for that update, not continuous monitoring or a legal opinion. Publication and substantive-update dates have different meanings. We do not change dates solely to suggest freshness. Check current official notices before travel and current filing rules before starting a dispute.

06

Examples are not outcome statistics

Worked examples explain a decision or calculation; they do not describe a real passenger unless explicitly identified as a documented case study. A few reported outcomes cannot establish a typical payout time or success rate. Any published case study needs records, permission and protection of personal information.

07

What this does not replace

FlyClaimer is an information and referral website, not a law firm, airline or claims adjudicator. A collective editorial byline does not imply a qualified lawyer has reviewed the page. Complex jurisdiction, deadline or court questions need advice from an appropriately qualified professional.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers for readers checking FlyClaimer content standards and transparency policies.

Does FlyClaimer decide if a claim is approved?
No. FlyClaimer provides informational guidance and first-pass route context. Final outcomes depend on the airline, claim evidence, applicable law, and any review or enforcement process.
Which rules are considered when guides are researched?
Guides may consider EU261, UK261, ECAA coverage, airline operating rules, airport disruption context, public regulator guidance, and the practical documents a traveler may need.
Why can two similar flights have different outcomes?
Eligibility can change because of the operating carrier, departure airport, arrival airport, delay length, missed connection timing, cancellation notice, and the airline response to extraordinary-circumstance questions.

Sources and provider information

Read the original guidance or terms. These reference links are not affiliate referrals.

Keep exploring

Useful next pages

Continue with related guides, policy pages, and contact options.